<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for write(this); //not that</title>
	<atom:link href="http://writethisnotthat.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://writethisnotthat.com</link>
	<description>Building Better Software through Social Refactoring</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:32:28 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Yet another reason to love WPF. by Casey</title>
		<link>http://writethisnotthat.com/2009/11/06/yet-another-reason-to-love-wpf/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writethisnotthat.com/?p=465#comment-39</guid>
		<description>I was not aware of that.  In general, though, my experiences with layout in WPF have been much easier than those with CSS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was not aware of that.  In general, though, my experiences with layout in WPF have been much easier than those with CSS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Yet another reason to love WPF. by latish</title>
		<link>http://writethisnotthat.com/2009/11/06/yet-another-reason-to-love-wpf/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>latish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writethisnotthat.com/?p=465#comment-38</guid>
		<description>CSS respects the same shorthand notation outlined here. Except that WPF decided to go with &quot;left, top, right, bottom&quot; instead of &quot;top, right, bottom, left&quot; used by CSS :(.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CSS respects the same shorthand notation outlined here. Except that WPF decided to go with &#8220;left, top, right, bottom&#8221; instead of &#8220;top, right, bottom, left&#8221; used by CSS <img src='http://writethisnotthat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If you have nothing good to say&#8230; say nothing! by Casey</title>
		<link>http://writethisnotthat.com/2009/11/04/if-you-have-nothing-good-to-say-say-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writethisnotthat.com/?p=459#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Pat would be very upset about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat would be very upset about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Night of the living hashCode() method! by ashish</title>
		<link>http://writethisnotthat.com/2009/10/30/night-of-the-living-hashcode-method/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>ashish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writethisnotthat.com/?p=449#comment-36</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s why I getting fond of unit testing. Specially those tests are by other peer. 

But, as &#039;Ron white&#039; says, you can&#039;t fix stupid. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s why I getting fond of unit testing. Specially those tests are by other peer. </p>
<p>But, as &#8216;Ron white&#8217; says, you can&#8217;t fix stupid. <img src='http://writethisnotthat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Night of the living hashCode() method! by habuma</title>
		<link>http://writethisnotthat.com/2009/10/30/night-of-the-living-hashcode-method/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>habuma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writethisnotthat.com/?p=449#comment-35</guid>
		<description>I had someone point out to me that &quot;null instanceof Something&quot; is always false, so the null check can also be removed. Good point...the initial mess was so bad that I overlooked that little detail. Making the appropriate edits now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had someone point out to me that &#8220;null instanceof Something&#8221; is always false, so the null check can also be removed. Good point&#8230;the initial mess was so bad that I overlooked that little detail. Making the appropriate edits now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
